Divide and Conquer
Adelson Funded study that is iGaming Out Swinging, To No Body’s Shock
Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson has funded a study that is four-state, unsurprisingly, doesn’t come up in favor of iGaming.
The thing about studies is, you can generally speaking get them to support pretty much any standpoint on just about such a thing, dependent on who is included and how you interpret the information. And when it’s mega-billionaire Las Vegas Sands CEO Sheldon Adelson funding the findings, you will be sure the studies will go any which way you want ’em to.
Adelson No iGaming Fan Himself
It is no news that Adelson for reasons that are not completely clear towards the remaining portion of the mostly pro-iGaming casino industry is vehemently, adamantly in opposition to the whole concept of Internet gambling. He’s been recognized to refer to the concept that is very ‘a cancer tumors waiting to take place’ and ‘a toxin which all good people need to resist,’ and even funded TV and print adverts the 2009 summer towards that end.
Now Adelson’s commissioned poll results on this topic are obtained and released by Nevada public affairs reporter Jon Ralston. The findings focus on four potentially key states in this matter: California, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Kentucky. Kentucky? Who knew. And even seasoned journalist Ralston who hosts the nightly Las Vegas political news show ‘Face to Face’ has noted on his weblog that the findings associated with study had been ‘quite startling’; mainly, the rather obviously self-serving leanings towards land gaming and away from the web form of the same. Namely, legal brick-and-mortar gambling enterprises were found to be ‘a method to come up with revenue for their state,’ with approval ratings which range from most of 66 percent in Pennsylvania (which includes already proved the maximum amount of with their recent growth in that arena), 61 percent in Kentucky, 57 % in California and 54 per cent in Virginia.
But the opinions on iGaming were perhaps not quite therefore friendly.
State Budget Crises Affect Outlooks
Particularly interesting there is that neither Kentucky nor Virginia already have any land that is legal at this juncture in time. For Pennsylvania and Ca, the support stemmed mainly from a need to help offset state budget deficits, even though land-based casino saturation nationwide is currently starting to rear its ugly mind and there clearly was more flatlining to come, according to some industry experts. In fact, the land casino that is latest to go up in Pennsylvania Isle of Capri, located in southwestern area Farmington had been forced to layoff 15 percent of its workforce only two months after opening.
Virginia study participants reportedly showed a disdain for ‘Las Vegas-style gaming.’ We guess that’s diverse from state, ‘Indian casino-style gaming’ or ‘politicians-from-the-suburbs-style gaming.’ What?
Where this study that is supposedly unbiased interesting is with its reported findings on Internet gambling, nonetheless. Because, according for this study, in all four queried states, 3x as many of people who participated failed to have a positive view of iGaming, by having an average that is overall off 66-22 on the ‘ we don’t want it’ part of the fence. According to wording (shock, shock), the views shifted slightly, and Kentucky and Virginia participants stated many vehemently that they were and only online casino bans, by 63-27 and 55-33 margins respectively.
The poll did not demonstrably differentiate between general Internet gambling and internet poker per se, however, and before anybody freaks out way too much by what some of this might potentially mean for the future of state-by-state iGaming being regulated and legalized, understand that, according to poker advocate Marco Valerio back in 2011, 67 percent of New Jerseyans had been dead set against online casinos, and we see how that played away.
Supreme Court Judge Rejects Challenge to New York Casino Referendum
Tioga Downs allows its feelings be understood in no uncertain terms regarding brand new York State’s upcoming casino referendum by voters. (Image source: Ithacajournal.com)
A brand New York State judge has refused a challenge to the wording of New York’s upcoming casino referendum, paving the way for voters in the state to vote on the measure in November.
The lawsuit ended up being dismissed by State Supreme Court Justice Richard M. Platkin, who found the challenge that is legal be ‘untimely and lacking in legal merit.’
Delayed Vote Shot Down
That was a big blow to opponents associated with the measure, who had hoped that they are able to delay a vote, or at least replace the wording that will appear on the ballot. The case was brought up by Brooklyn bankruptcy lawyer Eric J. Snyder, who objected to the language used in the referendum question. The measure will be described as ‘promoting task growth, increasing help to schools and permitting local governments to lower property taxes. on the ballot’
That ended up being the language that had been approved by the State Board of Elections in which consulted with Governor Andrew Cuomo to craft the measure july. The governor is a strong supporter of the measure, and crafted a range compromises and addresses different passions in hawaii to make such a proposition feasible.
However, Snyder and others said that the language being used was unfair. Since the language included suggested positive outcomes of the casino expansion, it could unfairly bias the total outcomes of the referendum. These concerns gained merit that is additional a poll by Siena College found that help for the ballot referendum increased by nine percentage points when the positive language was included, in comparison to when more neutral language had been used.
Justice Platkin dismissed these claims, though. He said that Snyder’s lawsuit had been filed far after the 14-day window in which challenges to ballot-language are permitted had passed. That screen began on August 19 or perhaps August 23, according to Snyder, though that would have made difference that is little the challenge was not made until October 1.
Naturally, the state was delighted that their arguments that are legal accepted, and that the vote would continue as planned.
‘We’re pleased that Judge Platkin accepted the arguments that are legal we raised and that the election process can continue moving forward,’ stated Board of Elections spokesman Thomas Connolly.
Opponents Voice Disappointment
Meanwhile, opponents of the measure were let down by predictably your choice.
‘We’re disappointed that the judge chose to block a discussion that is legitimate the merits of whether the state gamed the language of the casino amendment to tilt New Yorkers to a yes vote,’ stated a statement by the newest York Public Interest Research Group (NYPIRG).
But Snyder says that he’s not done yet. He plans to get emergency relief from the courts that are appellate and points out that the Board of Elections had the opportunity to make use of an earlier form of the referendum suggested by the state attorney general’s office that did not include the ‘advocacy language.’
‘Ignoring the attorney general’s recommendation, the Board of Elections changed the neutrally worded casino amendment by adding language to gain voter support,’ Snyder told The New York days.
If the measure should pass, it would talk about to seven casino that is new to selected parts of the Empire State. They would join a quantity of existing casinos that are owned and operated by indigenous US groups throughout the area.