Retired MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) within a poker competition week that is last.
Jose Canseco was the figure that is central a weekend for the poker world that was filled with fingers: some missing, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he appears to have lost the same finger for the next time in of a month, something which few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.
In late October, Canseco was in the headlines for accidentally shooting himself in the hand. Based on Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleansing his weapon in their kitchen. He wound up shooting his finger, which then needed to be surgically reattached. It seems some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, however.
Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament
According to a tweet sent down by Canseco on Friday, nevertheless, the hand became detached once again while he had been playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening.
‘ I happened to be playing in a poker tournament night that is last my little finger fell of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video clip of it.’
Fortunately, Canseco didn’t post that video, however there was at least one expected image of his finger before it fell off. As gruesome while the event may however sound, Canseco said that this outcome was inescapable from the time he shot himself.
‘My little finger needs to have been amputated from the beginning,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was very loose with no bone tissue to connect it. It ended up being additionally smelling really bad.’
There had been no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand in order to make up for losing the hand. Formerly, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year league that is major as being a expert baseball player, during which he hit 462 home runs.
Colman Provides Hellmuth the Verbal Finger
Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly attached, of their own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some comments that are harsh Hellmuth in a thread about the latter’s recent appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders writer Brian Koppelman.
‘Its embarrassing that individuals need to share whores like this guy to our profession,’ Colman wrote. ‘After we win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my hand in front of the camera and congratulate me personally. Just as if he’s the gatekeeper to your poker world and welcoming me in.
‘It is truly pathetic that the 40 year old would behave the way he does at the table, and undoubtedly exactly how spineless he is, simply willing to take any sponsorship whatever the company’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on. ‘ Really makes me personally unfortunate to think there’s a chance some people may look as much as this charlatan. Folks of their mindset and character really are a cancer to this globe.’
Hellmuth was evidently amazed and hurt by the reviews, and responded quickly to them on Twitter.
‘Ouch, I was just attacked big time on a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal plus it hurts, but I am proud regarding the man I will be!’
For their component, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was a touch too harsh, and chose to back the tone off of his post, also if he stood behind the message.
‘we admit to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of a message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘That being said, I still stand by the main gist of my post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I don’t think it belongs in this game.’
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims slot freebies quick hits that US sports that are legal should be regulated in the United States. (Image: USATSI)
Can legal US sports betting, across the board, ever be a thing? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the proper execution of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.
Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The ny Times recently, stating that he thinks it is the right time to allow sports gambling to happen lawfully through the United States. That stance is in opposition compared to that of all major activities organizations in america, including the previously held position by the NBA and its former commissioner, David Stern.
‘Betting on professional recreations is illegal in all the usa outside of Nevada,’ Silver said in the beginning of their opinion piece. ‘we think we need an alternative approach.’
Currently Prohibited generally in most States
Silver went on to outline the present state of sports gambling in america.
In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that currently had some as a type of the betting available. Nevada could be the only state with complete recreations betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon likewise have the best to offer more restricted kinds of sports-based gambling.
The NBA, along with other sports leagues and organizations in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports betting for decades as silver states. But who hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, regardless of lack of a legal, regulated choice.
‘But despite legal restrictions, sports gambling is widespread,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving business that is underground runs free from regulation or oversight. Because there are few appropriate possibilities, those who would like to bet resort to illicit bookmaking operations and shady offshore web sites.’
In accordance with Silver, some estimates put the volume of illegal activities gambling within the united states of america at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per year. That dwarfs the quantity of appropriate activities betting that happens in Las Vegas casinos and other locations in Nevada.
Trends Point Towards Regulation
Into the piece, Silver writes in regards to the ‘domestic and worldwide trends’ towards regulation of sports betting. He highlights that most states now offer at least some type of legal gambling, and that online gambling was already regulated in three states. Because of this, he says, it’s the perfect time for Congress to enact laws that are new replace PASPA.
‘Congress should adopt a federal framework that allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, topic to strict regulatory needs and technical safeguards,’ he wrote.
Silver has previously made reviews suggesting he would be thinking about seeing regulated sports betting in the usa, though this is actually the time that is first has presented his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to touch upon Silver’s stance.
Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance
Nevertheless, one or more NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that ‘Adam has it exactly right.’
‘In the past for PR reasons, we have actually put up token resistance to them,’ Cuban stated. ‘I accept Adam that now could be the time to take sports betting from the shadows and deal it is. with it like the huge business’
Despite Silver’s remarks, however, New Jersey shouldn’t expect the NBA to take out of a lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing recreations betting to go on at its casinos and racetracks.
‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as brand New Jersey’s recent initiative is going to be both unlawful and bad public policy,’ Silver composed.
Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson On-line Poker Ban Plan
Ron Paul laid out his arguments against an online gambling ban that happens to be highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)
Ron Paul has used his weekly column for the Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of People in the us and will be taken up only for the benefit of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.
The previous Republican Representative from Texas called legislation that is such example of ‘cronyism,’ something he says that most Americans are against aside from their political ideologies.
‘For instance, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul penned.
‘It is a secret that is open at least within the Beltway, that this legislation is being thought to be a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, whom is perhaps best known for making use of their enormous wealth to advance a pro-war foreign policy, is now making use of his governmental influence to turn their online competitors into criminals.’
Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March
Paul’s words relate to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans in both homely homes of Congress in March, and has since picked up tiny but notable amounts of bipartisan help in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw many forms of on line gambling during the federal level, basically changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just activities betting, as it is interpreted.
Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the various reasons provided for supporting the ban in an attempt to show that it was really only being considered for the sake of Adelson.
‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are inspired by way of a desire to curry benefit with a donor that is wealthy’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a quantity of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some declare that legalizing online gambling will enrich criminals as well as terrorists! But criminalizing casinos that are online not eradicate the need for online casinos. Instead, passage of this legislation will likely guarantee that the online gambling market is controlled by crooks.’
Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument
One of the major (and to many, perplexing) arguments used by supporters of RAWA is the fact that such a ban would in fact protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying down his reasoning for why it was faulty.
‘Their argument is the fact that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get those laws around by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul claimed. ‘ Whether or not the argument had merit that allowing states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it wouldn’t normally justify federal legislation on the issue…arguing that ‘states liberties’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which ended up being intended to limit federal power, on its head.’
Paul presented several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing his opposition to an online gambling ban.
‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is an infringement that is blatantly unconstitutional our liberties that will probably expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of all of the, it is all being done for the benefit of one powerful billionaire.’
RAWA is unlikely to get a hearing or see much movement in Congress through the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve in the Congress that is next Republicans will have majorities both in your house and Senate.